CASE STUDIES
Enhancing responsible gold production in line with the LBMA Guidance
The Company operates a gold project in southern Mali. It has committed to aligning its operations with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, such as the London Bullion Market Association’s (LBMA) Responsible Gold Guidance. The Company’s management team recognised that aligning would benefit the mine and its stakeholders by;
- Mitigating negative ESG impacts to improve production, strengthen community relationships and help maintain a social license to operate.
- Enhancing market competitiveness by addressing the growing demand for compliance with international ESG standards.
- Future-proofing the business by strengthening existing management systems so that they are resilient to future challenges.
Next step: Implementation
Following our support, the Company has a structured roadmap to formalise its management systems, strengthen due diligence and risk identification processes, and establish an operational-level grievance mechanism. As the Company advances its ESG practices, Kumi will continue to provide implementation support and guidance as needed.
Frequently asked questions
-
What does “responsible gold production” actually require?
It requires identifying and managing human rights, environmental, and governance risks throughout operations and supply chains.
-
Why does LBMA alignment matter?
LBMA alignment is often essential for market access and customer confidence, especially in precious metals supply chains.
-
What gaps do refiners commonly face?
Weak grievance mechanisms, incomplete risk documentation, and over‑reliance on audits are common issues.
-
Can audits alone demonstrate responsibility?
Audits are snapshots, not proof of ongoing risk management.
-
How do companies show continuous improvement?
Through documented risk mitigation, supplier engagement, and governance oversight.
-
Is this relevant outside the gold sector?
Yes. The principles apply across mineral supply chains.
